In the past, there were very few instances in which you would stumble upon real-time search in action, maybe some news-related inquiries.
The new Search Engine Results Page (SERP) interface makes real-time search a part of ANY given search, which makes it a much bigger deal for your search engine ranking traffic generation.
Your social media interactions have just become even more important.
Google and other search engines are now indexing tweets and other status updates from networks like Facebook and Myspace.
So what are their criteria for search engine ranking of tweets?
Not surprisingly, Google was very secretive about its real-time search engine ranking strategy for a while.
Eventually, some light was shed on that by Google’s lead developer of real-time search, Amit Singhal.
1. Reputation and popularity.
Turns out that Google does not judge you by HOW MANY followers you have, but by how REPUTABLE those followers are.
In that respect, driving traffic from Google’s real-time search engine ranking is very similar to its page ranking.
It’s all about the links. More precisely, it’s all about the QUALITY of the links.
“You earn reputation, and them you give reputation,”
says Amit Singhal.
“As high-quality pages link to another page on the Web, the quality of the linked-to page goes up. Likewise, in social media, as established users follow another user, the quality of the followed user goes up as well.”
So essentially, Google ranks tweets using a variation of its page-ranking algorithm. The more reputable links you have going to your content, the higher it ranks in Google.
Similarly, having followers with authority theoretically helps your tweets rank higher in Google real-time search and thus increase your search engine ranking traffic generation.
However, this is not the only factor.
2. Use of hashtags.
If you are big fan of hashtags and you would like to generate traffic from Google real-time search, stop using them.
According to Singhal, that’s a big red flag for lower quality tweets.
Trending topics on Twitter tend to be measured largely by tag popularity and tend to also attract tons of junk tweets.
Thus, use of hashtags can negatively reflect upon your real-time search engine ranking.
3. Context is important too.
Here is another noteworthy excerpt from Singhal’s interview:
Another problem: how, if someone is searching for “Obama,” to sift through White House press tweets and thousands of others to find the most timely and topical information. Google scans tweets to find the “signal in the noise,” he says. Such a “signal” might include a new onslaught of tweets and other blogs that mention “Cambridge police” or “Harry Reid” near mentions of “Obama.” By looking out for such signals, Google is able to furnish real-time hits that contain the freshest subject matter even for very common search terms.
4. Nothing is cut in stone.
As Chris Lake noted in his post at Econsultancy.com:
“We’re watching real time search closely to try to figure out what matters, and what doesn’t, but it’s worth pointing out that it’s very early in the day. As such, this is a braindump of possible ranking factors, rather than anything definitive.” - resource link: http://econsultancy.com/blog/5239-googles-real-time-ranking-factors-for-twitter
So here are some of those possible factors:
- Keywords: tweets loaded with keywords on the front end, as well links with keywords, may outrank tweets without them.
- Recency: will Google pay more attention to accounts with more activity?
- User name: keywords in your user name might also help.
- Age: since age plays a big role in Google search engine ranking, it’s possible that more established Twitter accounts will outrank the newer ones.
- External links: links to @WebTrafficCafe from (reputable) non-social media sites should boost my reputation as far as Google is concerned.
- Tweet Quantity: although the emphasis is on quality and popularity, the quantity may still matter. Makes sense: the more you tweet, the better chance you’ve got to be seen in Google real-time search results.
- Ratios of followed vs follow: may be compared to reciprocal linking. There is not as much value in being followed just because you follow someone; Google might question your true popularity, so a close ratio between the two can raise a red flag.
- Lists: it might also matter in how many lists you appear.
Let me touch very quickly on how Bing ranks tweets (as per WebNewsPro.com).
What it seems to come down to is the number of followers. If someone has a lot of followers, his/her tweets will get ranked higher. If a tweet is exactly the same as other tweets, it will get ranked lower. As simple as that (or maybe too simple).
Wrapping Up.
It’s not like Google is about to reveal to us how they REALLY rank the tweets. Plus, real-time search goes far beyond just tweets.
Still Twitter is a big player, and if we want to bring more traffic to our sites via real-time search, we’d better start paying closer attention to our social media standing.
Your are right: you don’t have to comment or retweet, but would it help if I told you it would be much appreciated?

About the Author: Ana Hoffman is the founder of Traffic Generation Cafe and wants you to know that Thesis + Scribe = SEO Made Simple. Get more from Ana on Facebook.
PS For more no-nonsense marketing training and tips from Ana, fill out this short spam-free form:






{ 23 comments… read them below or add one }
Definitely some points of interest for me there.
I do well with volume of tweets and followers (circa 55,000 with two main accounts @TheProfitShare and @FastSelfHelp) but variety of tweets could always increase. Over time this will get better as I find more web content to link to in my tweets and obviously as I enlarge my own web real estate.
Klout is a good tool to measure social influence and I wonder if Google could consider something similar to Klout within its social algorithm.
I’m sure realtime search could trend soon with Google but for now, I would think that the Twitter search tool is still the most popular for finding relevant tweets.
I wonder what getting Barack Obama to follow me would do for my realtime search rankings and authority.
On the other hand, perhaps Google are Republican’s, so actually penalise you?

Wayne Lambert invites you to read: Best Internet Marketing Tools
I personally find it useful to automatically tweet some blogs I am particularly fond of, Wayne. It helps the diversity, plus it’s great because the content is not mine. That, combined with the Tweet Old Post plugin, which automatically tweets my old posts - obviously
, gives me the ability to always tweet good content, whatever the time of day.
I am pretty sure Google figures out the user klout in a similar fashion - it only makes sense.
Love the sense of humor - I needed a chuckle.

Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: WPSubscribers Review: How to Get Your Subscription Rates Soar Through the Roof with Facebook Connect
Your blog content is already in my Twitter sequence so you will be getting some traffic from my followers.
Always happy to send traffic outwards, especially from my web properties because it does flow back. It also gives you more credibility since people know that everything you do isn’t just self serving but rather from the angle of provider of value.
I will check out that plugin to see if it adds value to my social strategy. I guess the trick for that to work would be to set it up to automate evergreen content rather than blog posts that are more time-sensitive.
Wayne Lambert invites you to read: OptimizePress v Profits Theme
Thank you, Wayne. You are right, it does flow back and adds credibility. I’m sure you’ll like the plugin.
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Does Bribing Your Readers and Twitter Followers Really Work?
Hi Ana! Would you mind letting us know the URL of the original interview with Google’s Amit Singhal? I just thought it might be helpful to see the whole interview on how Google may be using Twitter signals to add some context to your excellent insights. Just a thought- thanks so much!!!
I am not sure why I didn’t include the link, Scott - I always do; but at this point it would be nearly impossible for me to find the source.
By the way, I don’t recall seeing you on my blog before, but I already like you - you ask great questions!
Welcome.
Very interesting - thanks for putting together your insights. I often think that I should remember to use hashtags often, now I won’t worry about them unless it’s truly pertinent for community participation (i.e. when attending conferences, etc.)
I am with you, Anne - I always thought that it is much easier to be found through hashtags.
However, I’d rather get floods of traffic through real-time search engines than a few people looking up a hashtag.
Thanks for stopping by!
Hi Ana,
Your posts provide heaps of valuable and useful information. Thanks so much for sharing!!
All the best,
Darlene
I appreciate your vote of confidence, Darlene.
Thank You Ana!
Great article like always.
The more I learn the more I start to understand that I don't know much!
Learning never stops! The good news is it's not nearly as difficult as it sounds, plus SEO is a long-term strategy that can be leveraged over time.
Hey Ana,
Wow, that was all very interesting. Most of what you just said was new to me.
Thanks!
Susanna
Thanks, Susanna, glad you could stop by. It looks intimidating, but really is a simple strategy for those who are using social media anyway, like you do.
Thanks Ana, great tips, good to keep in mind if we want to be found!
Indeed, Laura - what's the point of having an online business if nobody can find you?
Ana,
Awesome tips as usual.
Your content is always over top and really helpful for beginners and pros!
I have to start working on leveraging my videos especially since i just started a 30 day video challenge.
Thanks Ana!!
Have a great night.
You are welcome, Tommy. Video marketing is one of my favorites, so I am rooting for you!
Hey Ana,
This is one great informative post. I haven't researched any of this yet, so I really got into it.
Thanks for putting the time in to school us on the latest Google news.
Google does keep us on our toes, doesn't it? Glad I could help, Chris.
Hi Ana,
Great article! I was unaware of most of what you mentioned above. As I am pretty 'green' where SEO marketing is concerned I appreciate any information I can get. The fact that Goggle and other search engines are no indexing tweets is very, very interesting.
Thanks for sharing this!
Have an awesome day!
Ilka
Very interesting content Ana-especially re hashtags-but it does make sense-Cheers kiaran
It does make sense, doesn't it?
{ 2 trackbacks }