Google Says: Your Blog Has Low-Quality Content And Here Is How to Fix It

by Ana | Traffic Generation on May 9, 2011 · 54 comments

get rid of low quality content

When it's got to go, it's got to go...

Did you know that low-quality pages can become a dead weight that would drag a website down?

But what would you consider a low-quality page? And what does it have to do with you?

Before we get into it though, let’s get back to the infamous Panda update for a second.

Not because I want to talk more about it, but because, according to official Google Webmaster Central Blog, Panda is only one of about 500 updates due to roll out this year!

The focus of all these updates is quality.

We all define quality content differently, but it doesn’t really matter what we think; it only matters what Google perceives to be quality content.

How Does Google Define as Quality Content?

And if you want to step into Google’s mindset, the questions below provide some insight into how THEY are looking at the issue (questions below are quoted from the same source above):

  • Would you trust the information presented in this article?
  • Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it more shallow in nature?
  • Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
  • Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?
  • Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
  • Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
  • Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
  • Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
  • How much quality control is done on content?
  • Does the article describe both sides of a story?
  • Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
  • Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
  • Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
  • For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?
  • Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?
  • Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
  • Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
  • Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
  • Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
  • Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
  • Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?
  • Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?
  • Would users complain when they see pages from this site?

Sounds like a tall order, but it really isn’t: if you are producing original, value-packed articles, you should be OK.

HOWEVER…

Low-quality content on some parts of your website can negatively affect your ENTIRE website’s rankings.

Low-Quality Content on Your Site?

You bet.

Do you have any news-oriented content that is obsolete by now?

Any articles you wrote hastily?

Anything that is too generic to matter?

Or Thanksgiving / Christmas greetings that no one really cares to read in the middle of May?

Low-quality content on some parts of your website can negatively affect your ENTIRE website’s rankings.

As we say it in Russia, repetition is the mother of knowledge - plus it’s that important.

One specific recommendation Google makes to take care of your low-quality content is to remove it altogether or merge it with other pages to create a better quality page - doing that kind of maintenance could eventually help the rankings of your higher-quality content.

Before I got the scoop on this issue on Google’s blog a couple of days ago, I read about it in a post on Michael Gray’s blog and thought “Wow, dude, a bit too extreme, don’t you think? Deleting your content?”

Of course, now that I read about Google recommending the same thing, I can only thank Michael for, once again, leading the pack.

Get Rid of Dead Weight

So what are the recommendations that Michael makes as far as getting rid of your dead weight content?

Step 1: Identify the candidates.

First step is always research.

The best tool for this is Google Webmaster Tools.

You’ll need three pieces of information (all are under “Your Site on the Web” tab):

  1. All the pages on your site.
  2. How many links each page has (found under “Links to your site”).
  3. How many clicks each page gets (found under “Search Queries ==> Top Pages)

The annoying part is that the info is under two different tabs.

So what I did was outsourced putting together on one spreadsheet all 3 pieces of info. It’s up to you how you would like to handle it and how big your site is to begin with. Might be an easy job for you to do on your own.

Step 2: Deal with under-performers.

Now that you know which pages are not performing too well (don’t get many clicks and not many links), you need to find the best way to deal with them.

Note: how many clicks are too few? When I was putting together my research, Google Webmaster Tools let me pull the stats for the past month and a half only. So with that in mind, I decided that anything that got less than 10 clicks within that time frame qualifies as an under-performer.

The only two ways to “deal” with that kind of content is to:

  1. Rewrite it or combine with other low-value content to make it into something useful and beneficial to your readers.
  2. If the above won’t work for the post, delete it.

I know, it sounds very harsh and final, but per Google, it’s a perfectly good way to possibly increase the importance and thus rankings for your other valuable pages.

And I am sure we are all for that.

Step 3: BACK UP before you making changes.

Very important and very overlooked step.

Before you get on with your spring cleaning, make sure ALL you data - and I am not talking about just the database, you need to backup everything: images, posts, etc.- EVERYTHING is backed up.

Backup WordPress EasilyNote: I’ve tried a lot of different ways to back up my blog, especially after hearing about so many blogs we all know, or knew I should say, and read, being highjacked by hackers. Backing up your blog is not an option, it’s a must. And after all the plugins I’ve tried, I’ve settled with the paid option of BackUp Buddy. It’s paid because it backs up EVERYTHING and the data is easily retrieved if the need be, and their price is very reasonable. Please do yourself and your blog a favor and check it out now.

Step 4: Set up redirection.

If a post you are relocating or deleting had more than a couple of links going to it, I suggest you set up a redirection of the old URLs to the new ones.

The best and the easiest way to do it is through a plugin. There are multiple ones to choose from; I personally use the plugin that is simply called “Redirection“.

Where to redirect your links to?

If you are simply relocating the page, then the answer is easy.

But if you are deleting the post altogether, then the best place to send those links to is a theme-related post, category or tag pages, or, as the last resort, to your home page.

Step 4: Improve the rankings of your stronger posts.

This step has really nothing to do with our spring cleaning, but it’s an important step towards our ultimate goal: making the rest of our content more valuable and increasing its search engine rankings.

And… it’s a post in its own right.

Marketing Takeaway

Let’s start with the first three steps, get rid of some of the dead weight our blogs carry, and then I’ll see you right back here, on Traffic Generation Cafe, most likely next Monday, with the post on how to further optimize your front running content for it to rank even higher.

However, don’t wait till next Monday to come back; I publish valuable info on free traffic generation on a daily basis, so check back often!

Soooo…. Are you going to do it or ignore it? Comment to show me that you’re alive!

ana hoffman low quality content

Image credit: FireHow.com

More Great Posts on the Topic:

  1. Mistery of Google PageRank Solved?
  2. SEO Content Writing: How to Write a Title Pleaser That Ranks Well Too
  3. Article Spinning: You Spin Me Right ‘round, Baby, Right ‘round
  4. Improve Your Google Ranking: From Lame To Fame in 4 Easy Steps
  5. Content Recycling: How to Turn Articles into Videos in 5 Minutes

Subscribers Magnet

{ 54 comments… read them below or add one }

Brad Harmon from Big Feet Marketing May 11, 2011 at 7:40 pm

I’ve been thinking about this topic a lot lately, Ana. Since I split off two blogs from my original one, I’m left with a bunch of old posts that I’m not sure I want to keep.

I love the idea of combining some of your posts into one. I hadn’t thought of that before, and would have likely just deleted some posts that would be great for this solution. I also appreciate your thoughts on where to redirect posts I decide to delete. My first thought would have been back to my homepage, but your suggestions are so much better.
Brad Harmon @ Big Feet Marketing invites you to read: Why Your Blog is Costing You BusinessMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 12, 2011 at 1:39 am

I’m glad this post was of benefit and answered some of your questions, Brad. Always nice to see you around my blog.
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: How to Use Google Search Query Terms to Learn More About Any SiteMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Terje Sannarnes May 11, 2011 at 2:33 pm

Awesome post Ana, reading this makes me realize I have a enormous job to go back and update and edit my previous posts. Thanks for this. By the way, I really enjoy seeing your Alexa ranking Sky rocketing!! :-) You are doing an terrific job and are a huge role model for all blog owners. I for one do admire your work.
Terje Sannarnes invites you to read: No Face- No Comment- a Piece of Advice for an entrepreneurMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 12, 2011 at 1:42 am

Wow… I’m loving all the compliments! :-) Thank you so much.

It may seem like an enormous job, but think about the end results.
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: What Can We Learn From the King of BloggingMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Adrienne May 11, 2011 at 11:59 am

Good post Ana and not too pleased to hear of even more changes Google will be making in the near future.

I know I have some posts on my blog that aren’t exactly top quality any longer since I’ve been writing for two years now and in the beginning I was just writing to get traffic to my site and not doing it very well either. You know, really green and inexperienced. So those posts I now can see don’t even belong on my blog anymore but wow, deleting them all.

My blog is a PR4 and I have an Alexa rating of 90,275 so I’m thinking that ain’t bad! I was not affected at all by this recent change so I know I’m still on the right track. But thank you for sharing this. Guess I have a lot of thinking to do.

Adrienne

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 12, 2011 at 1:44 am

I know - the Google changes don’t win them too many fans. Well done on your ranking and Alexa rating - that’s great and it means that your posts could not have been “that bad”.
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Google Says- Your Blog Has Low-Quality Content And Here Is How to Fix ItMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Rakesh Kumar May 11, 2011 at 6:30 am

Still yet i am not facing and problem with panda affect but thanks i will keep these tips for future reference.
Rakesh Kumar invites you to read: Samsung Hero E2232 Price – Entry Level Dual Sim GSM Mobile PhoneMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 11, 2011 at 10:33 am

I’m glad you’re not having hassles with it. Thanks for stopping by.
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Targeted Website Traffic- 3 “Time Wasters” That Can Drive Massive TrafficMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Steve from Internet Lifestyle May 11, 2011 at 6:06 am

Ana,

I have to say I have some mixed feeling about this. One one hand i love that Google is taking a harder line on a lot of the fluff and bad stuff out there. Since I think a lot of my stuff is at least “decent” this doesn’t scare me.

Of course, like you said, this doesn’t mean that there are not some clunker articles, or ones that are dated, or never really ranked (actually a lot of those). The idea of deleting these does seem a bit harsh.

You make some really good points, though, so I will have to look into it. At lest freshen a few up and delete the stinkers.
Steve@Internet Lifestyle invites you to read: How to Turn your To-Do List into a To-Done ListMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 11, 2011 at 10:36 am

Many bloggers share your sentiment - having mixed feelings about Google’s approach. If deleting the old ones is harsh, just update them a little.
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Friday’s Quick Tips for Keeps- Are You Sure You Want to Do ThisMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

hyderali May 11, 2011 at 12:33 am

Hi Ana,

Definitely worth reading on throwing out low quality content & making some good high quality content. But I also learned from their blog that they demand more in depth content with some images, diagrams or beneficial. Its been great to know from you although you are not totally in seo but learning & guiding others.

Also I wrote you a mail regarding guest post & also tweet you but not getting any reply from your end. Hoping to get reply soon.

Thanks.

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 11, 2011 at 12:46 am

Thanks for stopping by and thanks for your valued comment. I will answer your messages as soon as I can, just been out of the office quite a bit. I will catch up! :-)

Reply

Joshua May 10, 2011 at 9:28 pm

Honestly, Google is much more demanding in terms of quality than the average internet user. I would never judge things in terms of the likelihood of me giving away my credit card info. i mean i don’t care how well the website is written, that’s a no-no! :) )

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 11, 2011 at 12:49 am

I know what you mean and you are quite right. However, millions of credit card transactions take place over the internet every day and for many people the quality of content on a site is a major factor.
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Targeted Website Traffic- 3 “Time Wasters” That Can Drive Massive TrafficMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

John Komatsoulis from Learn About May 10, 2011 at 6:10 pm

Thanks for the information Ana :)

I’ve cracked Alexa’s 200k plateau and I’m now more hungry to hit the 100k mark. I’ve recently started reworking my old pages, so I look forward to seeing how this will play in my growth.

If you took a look at my blog, what’s the one thing you would recommend I improve upon?

I appreciate your feedback, John
John Komatsoulis@Learn About invites you to read: Five Tips to Increase Sales with an Auto DialerMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 11, 2011 at 6:17 pm

Only because you asked nicely, John - and now you might regret asking: I would change your domain name and blog tagline; neither is reflective of what you write about and/or stand out enough. Not good branding.

Ana

Reply

John from Learn About May 12, 2011 at 12:15 pm

I don’t regret asking Ana :)

What kind of tagline would you recommend?
John @ Learn About invites you to read: The Perfect Way to Improve Link PopularityMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 12, 2011 at 8:14 pm

I wish I had time to give you a good substitute, John, but it requires a lot of thinking.

When you say Learn About, one immediately thinks about what? Learnaboutus doesn’t work, because we quite honestly don’t want to learn about YOU, we, your readers want to learn about OUR problems and solutions.

Ana

Reply

John from Learn About May 13, 2011 at 2:04 pm

You work too hard Ana, you need more free time. :)

I agree that people want a solution to their own problems, however I’m sure the domain name is not going to shun people away just because of the US. It’s a curiosity thing, people will still come visit because they want to find out what they can learn about.

I’ll make sure to get your feedback when I do come up with a new tag line.

John
John @ Learn About invites you to read: Increase your Website Traffic for Free with Social Network SitesMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Self Publishing Blog May 10, 2011 at 12:42 pm

Thanks for the info Ana. Say, do you know what I can do about my Pr rating. I have 37 quality incoming links so far and Alexa rank of 200k and ‘m still on PR0. Any way I can fix that because it’s obviously hurting my business.

Reply

Riya from Couponseasy May 9, 2011 at 11:18 pm

I had question for very long time. How Google actually decide whether the content is quality one or just waste and finally got the answer.

But I’ve one doubt here Ana!. If you look for news sites/blogs they all publish almost same news with little different title or may be same but they still get good ranking in SERP…….. How Google actually performs it’s duty in this case.
Riya @ Couponseasy invites you to read: HostGator Coupon Codes- Latest Promo Discount Vouchers Daily UpdatedMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Justin | Mazzastick May 9, 2011 at 8:01 pm

Ana,

I will have to go back and re-write some of my earlier posts because they would be considered weak.

I like what Google is doing because it will weed out some or most of the non-valuable/non-original websites that are out there allowing the cream to rise to the top.
Justin | Mazzastick invites you to read: Cultivating A Real Relationship With YourselfMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Jack Foley May 10, 2011 at 1:42 am

Hi Ana,

Absolute great content as usual. I agree that alot of my posts are too weak to get high rankings on google.

Will adopt your strategies for increasing my blog post performance
Jack Foley invites you to read: Precious metals &amp Oil InvestingMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 11, 2011 at 10:38 am

Thanks Jack. Give it a try and let me know how the performance is improved.
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Friday’s Quick Tips for Keeps- Are You Sure You Want to Do ThisMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 11, 2011 at 12:58 am

It would be a good idea to rewrite your older posts, Justin. I agree, Google will weed out the rubbish.
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Free SEO Report- Much Ado About NothingMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

George Fourie May 9, 2011 at 6:52 pm

Hey Ana!

Excellent tips! Getting stuck into Google Webmaster tools which is something I’ve put off for quite a while.

I do think that Authority and consistency completely outweighs shorter posts though.

There are tons of great blogs that focus on short posts only. Look at Seth’s blog for one which is hardly ever more than a paragraph or two if he’s being generous.

Another one is the mighty Mashable of course.

Mashable’s posts are always short with impact.
George Fourie invites you to read: Tribe Syndication – A Murderer Of Great Content – Episode 3My ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 11, 2011 at 1:02 am

Hi George - you are right, authority does outweigh the length of posts - but how do you get 1) authority and 2) a following? If you gain those two things, you can get away with the odd short post. Most people want info - and on certain topics, they require a lot of it.
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Blog Commenting Flops- Do These to Lose Traffic and LinksMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

George Fourie May 11, 2011 at 1:59 am

True.

I must say that a longer post like this with real value makes a massive difference. My eyes are use to the 500-600 word cut off mark and got more engaged realising that you were going into more depth.

And yeah, Seth, Mashable, etc are established with authority, so guess they can kinda do what they want at this point.

Seth and co can probably generate more traffic from blogging on a old bar napkin that us ‘normal’ bloggers! :)

(And looking at where your traffic is headed, we can most probably exclude you from the ‘us’ put your name above their too!)
George Fourie invites you to read: Tribe Syndication – A Murderer Of Great Content – Episode 3My ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 11, 2011 at 2:34 am

Haha - that’s exactly what I’m trying to say, George!
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Top Google Rankings- Straight From the Horse’s MouthMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Chris R. Keller May 9, 2011 at 2:02 pm

I did not know if maybe there was something similar to the below for the content updates. Maybe not even from google but some estimates from some experts. If you do find anything definitely let me know…:)

importance of factors for google rankings
http://searchenginewatch.com/3642269

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 11, 2011 at 2:36 am

Thanks for sharing, Chris. I’ll check it out and let you know if there is something else.
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Google Says- Your Blog Has Low-Quality Content And Here Is How to Fix ItMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Justin Germino May 9, 2011 at 11:51 am

Very interesting about removing older articles, but if the older articles were to negatively affect the entire site wouldn’t big news and magazine sites with old articles out of date have negative impact on their homepages. They don’t remove content because it is outdated, though an update can sometimes be warranted.

I am going to do more research into this.
Justin Germino invites you to read: Using Google Alerts to Find Newsworthy Content for Your Niche SiteMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 9, 2011 at 11:52 am

You are quite right, Justin. Nothing worse than outdated info.
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Top Google Rankings- Straight From the Horse’s MouthMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Justin Germino May 9, 2011 at 12:04 pm

One thing I was considering is sometimes that traffic could come from Twitter or social media and older content may not perform on Google Search, but may be revitalized with Tweet Old Post or something similar.

PS, if you use the ReplyMe plugin you should make the response link back to the comment a link, here is my article on this -> http://www.dragonblogger.com/customize-wordpress-replyme-plugin/ highly recommended.
Justin Germino invites you to read: Using Google Alerts to Find Newsworthy Content for Your Niche SiteMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 9, 2011 at 1:58 pm

Well, that’s why the both measurements: the amount of links and traffic have to be considered to determine the quality of a page.

If you are not getting any clicks with Tweet Old Post, then it still is a candidate for RIP or relocation.

By the way, one of my readers stumbled upon an outdated post via that plugin a few days ago - it was a tip that worked at the time, but the site since then fixed the bug, and my post is not longer pertinent. So even if it gets clicks, the info itself is outdated.

I will definitely check out your ReplyMe post, Justin; thanks for the link.

Ana
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Blog Commenting Flops- Do These to Lose Traffic and LinksMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Justin Germino May 9, 2011 at 2:09 pm

Very true, in this case I will often put an Update section into the article at the top to inform of updates, but I won’t scrap an older article with outdated info if it gets good traffic, I will just update it so the reader doesn’t get misinformed and direct them to something more accurate specifically saying the rest of the article is for reference of original article only.
Justin Germino invites you to read: Review of Komoona for Hosting Blog AdvertisementsMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Chris R. Keller May 9, 2011 at 10:46 am

Hi Ana, great article. Iagree I think we will see in the future google doing a lot more to reduce the rankings of low quality content and increase the value of high quality content. Have you been able to find anywhere how they are going to measure this or any insights on what factors will be given what weightings, what factors will be the most important?

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 9, 2011 at 1:53 pm

No, Chris, they are definitely not spilling the beans. :)

If they ever do, I’ll keep you updated.

Ana
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Free SEO Report- Much Ado About NothingMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Kazia from KitchenTableMarketing May 9, 2011 at 10:10 am

Great post! So many of us forget about our old posts. Especially the ones we created way back when we were first blogging! I’m sure many of mine could use a good spring clean. And heck, I bet a lot of those old posts could use some internal links to more recent posts in my blog too ;) .

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 9, 2011 at 11:50 am

Exactly! You have learned a lot since you first started and you could now implement that knowledge to capitalize on those old posts. All the best!
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Top Google Rankings- Straight From the Horse’s MouthMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Katie Goode from Be Extraordinary Today May 9, 2011 at 10:09 am

I’m so glad you wrote this today. I just deleted a bunch of older posts that weren’t relevant to the new direction of my blog over the weekend. But, since I did this, google webmaster tools is saying I have a bunch of “not found” errors in my site map. How do I clean these up? Or do they just go away on their own?

Thanks Ana!
Katie Goode @Be Extraordinary Today invites you to read: Free Book for EntrepreneursMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 9, 2011 at 1:46 pm

Just use the redirection plugin I mentioned, Katie - that should take care of any problems.
Ana | Traffic Generation invites you to read: Top Google Rankings- Straight From the Horse’s MouthMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Vivek Parmar May 9, 2011 at 9:31 am

Ana you have added value information in this article. after Pandat Update suddenly my traffic increase and getting better results now.
Will look into webmaster tools to see which page not performing well. One thing is sure i’m not going to delete any of the post

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 9, 2011 at 11:38 am

That’s wonderful! I’m glad it’s working for you.

As far as deleting the old pages goes - I understand not everyone will be doing it. I know I will though.

Reply

Kim May 9, 2011 at 8:26 am

Thank you for this valuable information. I am definitely going to try to clean up our dead weight! I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately and your post has cleared up a lot of my questions!
Kim invites you to read: Three Great Clothing LinesMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 9, 2011 at 11:41 am

You’re welcome, Kim.

Reply

Cathy May 9, 2011 at 8:21 am

I cringed when I read the part about short articles being low quality. On my main blog, I average about 600 words per article but a few are much longer. One article is over 2,000 words.
The thing is, I also have “quick tips” which are posts that are relevant and original but only about 75-200 words. I wonder if these are going to hurt me?

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 9, 2011 at 11:42 am

Hurt is a strong word… While we all like reading quick tips, if they are valuable, why not expand on them some more to make the post longer? Add some related tips, or some background info to make it longer. Hope this helps. :-)

Reply

Ivan Widjaya May 9, 2011 at 7:45 am

Hi Ana,

Removing low-quality content DOES work wonders. My http://www. CloudBusinessReview.com is dropping 200 ranks down for the main keyword after the Panda update.

One of the culprits is that I used to publish press releases on the blog. I removed all of them and the blog starts climbing up the ladder - with no SEO/link building effort - not only for the main keyword, but also for others.

I don’t know whether the impact should be this instant, but for me, the impact is real.

Cheers!
Ivan Widjaya invites you to read: Failure is a Fresh Start – a Lesson from Thomas EdisonMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 9, 2011 at 11:43 am

I’m so glad that you are already seeing results, Ivan. Thanks for letting me know.

Reply

TrafficColeman May 9, 2011 at 7:19 am

Take pride in your writing so the search engine can do the same. Once you put hard work into then this is when you see great things happen.

“Black Seo Guy “Signing Off”
TrafficColeman invites you to read: Stupid Thief Stole Content Off My WebsiteMy ComLuv Profile

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 9, 2011 at 11:44 am

Wise words there as usual. Thanks for stopping by.

Reply

Harrison Li May 9, 2011 at 7:06 am

Wow, definitely the most uniquely written article related to the recent Panda update issue,

For step. 4 in my opinion I wouldn’t set up any redirections, since the old low-quality pages that Google classifys are lowly ranked, even though it has some link juice or it might be a killer post, I would still delete it completely, or just reword it and use a different URL for it.

This is mainly because the old article is lowly ranked and it may impact the overall rank of your own site (not really visible, what can such a tiny thing do?) but little things adds up, by all means I would reword the post and create a new post of it.

Plus, if it was a timely post written back in (ages ago), your readers probably have forgotten, therefore you only have to do so little work in order to deliver a well written article.

By the way, for the step after the first step 4 you mistaked it again as step 4, should it be step 5 or does it stay step 4 for a reason?

Oh and this is definitely informative :)

Happy Blogging, Cheers,
Harrison

Reply

Ana | Traffic Generation May 9, 2011 at 11:46 am

You are quite right, Harrison - small things add up. Regarding the two step 4′s - I was testing to see if the people are reading my blog and I am glad that you are ;-)

Reply

Leave a Comment

CommentLuv Enabled

 

Check This Box to Get Access to My SEO Report and Exclusive Traffic Generation Tips.

 

Previous post:

Next post: